Google Found Guilty of Antitrust Violations Case Filed By US Govt.

A federal judge recently determined that Google misused its dominant position in the search and advertising markets. This landmark decision found the tech giant guilty of engaging in anti-competitive practices to maintain its monopoly, marking a significant win for the US Department of Justice (DoJ). Here’s a detailed explanation of the case against Google, what transpired during the proceedings, the involved parties, and the judge’s ruling this week.

How the US vs. Google Battle Began

In 2020, the Justice Department, along with several states, filed an antitrust lawsuit against Google, alleging that the search giant held an illegal monopoly in the online search market. The trial began in September 2023, overseen by Judge Amit P. Mehta of the District Court.

The Charges Against Google

The US government accused Google of monopolizing the search engine and advertising business. They argued that Google employed unfair tactics to prevent competition. For instance, Google struck billion-dollar deals with phone companies like Apple and internet browsers to ensure that Google Search was the default search engine. This made it difficult for users to switch to other search engines.

The lawsuit was filed under antitrust laws, including the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 and the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914. These laws prohibit monopolies, actions that restrain trade, and specific unfair practices, aiming to promote fair competition.

DoJ’s Arguments

The US Department of Justice contended that Google’s monopolistic position in the search market was built on anti-competitive practices. They highlighted that Google paid billions to companies like Apple to be the default search engine on iPhones and other devices, effectively excluding competitors.

Google’s search advertising business generates massive revenue and holds a dominant share of the search market, especially on mobile devices. These factors have raised concerns about fair competition and consumer choice.

The Trial Proceedings

Judge Mehta listened to arguments from both sides and invited tech executives from various companies, including Google, Apple, and Microsoft, to testify. The trial lasted for 10 weeks, featuring testimonies from Google CEO Sundar Pichai, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, Apple’s Senior Vice President of Services Eddy Cue, and Apple’s Senior Vice President of Machine Learning and AI Strategy John Giannandrea.

Google’s Defense

Google defended its practices, claiming its dominance was due to the quality of its search engine. Nadella disclosed that Microsoft’s negotiations with Apple to make Bing the default search engine on iPhones had failed. Apple executives suggested that Google’s search engine was superior to Microsoft’s on mobile. It was also revealed that Google paid Apple around $20 billion in 2022, representing 36% of the advertising revenue generated from Safari searches.

Judge Amit Mehta’s Ruling

Judge Mehta issued a 277-page ruling, highlighting that Google abused its dominant position in the search and advertising markets. The court found that Google maintained a monopoly through anti-competitive behavior, and its exclusive search agreements with device manufacturers and browsers solidified its dominance.

Mehta noted that Google “enjoys an 89.2% share of the market for general search services, which increases to 94.9% on mobile devices.” The court concluded that Google’s actions prevented competitors from gaining a foothold in the market, harming consumers by limiting choices and potentially increasing prices.

Google’s Response to the ‘Ironic’ Ruling

Google announced plans to appeal the decision, pointing out the irony in the court ruling. Kent Walker, President of Global Affairs at Google, stated that the company acknowledges the court’s recognition of its superior search engine but disagrees with the ruling that it abused its position.

“This decision recognizes that Google offers the best search engine but concludes that we shouldn’t be allowed to make it easily available. We appreciate the Court’s finding that Google is ‘the industry’s highest quality search engine, which has earned Google the trust of hundreds of millions of daily users,’ that Google ‘has long been the best search engine, particularly on mobile devices,’ ‘has continued to innovate in search,’ and that ‘Apple and Mozilla occasionally assess Google’s search quality relative to its rivals and find Google’s to be superior.’ Given this, and that people are increasingly looking for information in more and more ways, we plan to appeal. As this process continues, we will remain focused on making products that people find helpful and easy to use.”

Also Read: How to Change Region in Google Search with Any Browser